Embodying an invisible disability means I'm constantly in a state of passing, whether I want to be or not, unless I make a deliberate point of naming the disability.
But that act of naming flies in the face of what Robert McRuer calls, in his book Crip Theory, "compulsory able-bodiedness" -- a cultural norm that insists upon ability, or non-disability, as normal.
Naming myself "ill" or "disabled" is transgressive within this paradigm. Failing to fake able-bodied status is to court shame in a cultural milieu in which the idea that "health is the only thing" is regularly trumpeted. The "crippled" are objects for pity, because a full and fulfilling life , according to this mind-set, is possible only for the healthy and the able-bodied.
In other areas, I don't strive to be normal, whatever that might be. I embrace my own idiosyncracies and oddities, and I seek out others who are odd and idiosyncratic because they tend to be interesting.
But when it comes to expectations about hiding illness or infirmity, I have a much harder time making transgression my own.
Part of the problem has to do with the fact that living with infirmity is in fact a hassle. It's just plain difficult to function when a major life activity like breathing is not going well. But compulsory able-bodiedness has a corollary: we're supposed to buck up without complaint and bear our ills patiently.
But part of the story involves my own investment in that cultural mode of compulsion, such that claiming/testifying/confessing infirmity feels like a failure. I'm trying to get beyond that, but I'm wrestling.
10 April 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Interesting: for so many years I was/am so embarrassed about having asthma that I would hide my use of inhaler as if it were snorting meth. I never could figure out why.
ReplyDeleteDoes it make me seem weak? Draw too much unwanted attention?
I do the same. Still.
ReplyDelete