I just stumbled over a carbon footprint calculator that tells you how much carbon you can avoid spewing into the environment by making various lifestyle changes.
One of the sections available is drinking less. And I learned that if I cut out my habit of drinking a glass of wine or a little single malt once a week or so, I can reduce my carbon output by something like 266 pounds a year.
Context: if I ride my bike to work one day a week instead of driving, I save 2619 pounds of CO2.
More context: I've never in my life been drunk. Having a drink relaxes me a little at the end of the day, and I like the taste. I've gone weeks, months, sometimes years, without having a drink and without missing it.
But for some reason the idea that I should cut back leaves me feeling kind of whimpery.
Which raises another issue. If I'm already doing lots of things to try to reduce my environmental impact -- avoiding meat, trying to drive less, choosing fair trade coffee, living in a small apartment rather than a big house, even drinking relatively little alcohol -- what responsibility do I have to cut back further?
To what extent should changing our lives make us uncomfortable? Can we reverse, or even slow, climate change without collectively being very uncomfortable?
17 February 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am perfectly willing (and have) changed a lot of habits to reduce my carbon footprint. I eat significantly less meat and spend more money to eat local. I've been known to dry clothes outside on the line. Give up wine? I think not. Jeanine
ReplyDelete